How it works.

A multi-stage reasoning pipeline. Over 2,000+ data points per call. Resolved in seconds.

The engine

A purpose-built reasoning pipeline.

Built for one job: calibrated probabilistic forecasting. Where generalist AI gives you a paragraph of hedged language, Prophiq gives you a ranked, calibrated answer - backed by an ensemble of reasoning systems and a consensus engine purpose-built for the task.

Every Prophiq call runs through a multi-stage analytical pipeline. Real-time research is pulled from across the globe, then evaluated independently by an ensemble of frontier reasoning systems. Prophiq's consensus engine merges their answers using a calibrated weighted Borda count - the same scoring method used in academic forecasting research.

01
Research
Real-time data pulled from across the globe - historical patterns, market signals, expert commentary, breaking news.
02
Reasoning
An ensemble of frontier reasoning systems evaluates each question independently, ranking possible outcomes with calibrated probabilities.
03
Consensus
Prophiq's engine merges the independent rankings using a weighted Borda count, producing a single calibrated answer with reasoning.
Over 2,000+
Data points per call
< 8s
Avg. resolution time
The data

Two layers of intelligence, one calibrated answer.

Prophiq runs on two layers of intelligence in parallel. Real-time research pulled from across the globe - market signals, historical patterns, expert commentary, breaking news. And our own calibration record - a proprietary dataset of every call Prophiq has made and every outcome that resolved it, across all four domains.

Both feed every forecast. Each resolved event becomes signal in the next call, sharpening calibration across the system.

Every forecast Prophiq makes is structured, scored, and folded back into the system. That feedback loop runs on every call - the layer no generalist AI carries. It's what makes Prophiq the right tool for decisions where calibration matters.

The principle

We give you probabilities, not predictions.

When Prophiq says "60% Verstappen wins Monaco," it is not predicting that Verstappen wins. It is saying: more likely than not, but far from certain. The right way to read a probability isn't "will this happen?" - it's "how confident should I be?"

This makes calibration matter more than hit rate. A perfectly calibrated forecaster who says 60% should be right 60% of the time - and wrong 40% of the time, by design. Those misses aren't failures. They're the math working as intended.

Reading the percentage

What the numbers mean.

A probability is a measurement of confidence, not a prediction of outcome. Here's how to read them:

50-59%
A lean, but the outcome is close to a coin flip.
60-74%
Likely. We have meaningful conviction.
75-89%
Strong call. The signal is clear.
90%+
High confidence. We'd be surprised if this didn't happen.
Recent calls

How it's played out.

Recent forecasts and how they resolved.

F1 · Monaco GPLanded
Will Max Verstappen win the Monaco Grand Prix?
Our call62%
OutcomeVerstappen

A clean signal: Red Bull's chassis advantage on tight street circuits has been steady all season. Confidence matched outcome.

Politics · UK by-electionLanded
Will Labour hold the seat?
Our call54%
OutcomeLabour, by 800

Polling markets had this at 85%. Prophiq saw a narrower contest. The margin proved us closer than the consensus.

Markets · Fed decisionDid not land
Will the Fed hold rates at its June meeting?
Our call58%
Outcome25bps cut

A 58% call should miss about 42% of the time. This was one of those. Reading a 58% forecast as a guarantee misses the point.

Entertainment · OscarsLanded
Who wins Best Picture?
Our call71%
OutcomeAnora

Late guild momentum was the tell. Higher confidence, landed at the higher rate.

Got a question? Ask Prophiq.

Ask something →